Is photometric or radar better for an indoor simulator?

For tight indoor rooms, photometric is usually the easier fit: the camera sits beside the ball and reads impact, so it needs little depth. Radar tracks ball flight and prefers more room behind and in front of the ball, so it shines in deeper rooms and outdoors.

Why does radar need more space than photometric?

Radar measures the ball as it travels, so it needs enough flight distance to gather data. Indoors that means placing the unit several feet behind the ball and allowing ball-to-screen distance. Photometric cameras capture the ball and club at the moment of impact, so they work from beside the ball with minimal depth.

Which launch monitors are photometric and which are radar?

Radar examples include the Garmin Approach R10 and FlightScope Mevo+. Photometric examples include the Bushnell Launch Pro and Foresight units. The SkyTrak+ combines both (photometric plus radar).

Home › Guides › Photometric vs radar

Launch monitors · Explainer

Photometric vs radar launch monitors

The two ways a launch monitor reads your shot decide how much space it needs indoors. Here's the difference in plain terms — and which suits your room.

Last updated: June 2026 · See our methodology.

Short answer: photometric (camera, sits beside the ball) is the easier fit for tight indoor rooms; radar (tracks ball flight from behind) prefers more depth and shines in larger rooms and outdoors. The SkyTrak+ uses both.

How each one works

Radar (Doppler): sits behind the ball and tracks it through the air, measuring flight to derive speed, launch and spin. Because it watches the ball travel, it likes a little distance behind the ball and toward the screen.

Photometric (camera): sits beside the ball and takes high-speed images of the ball and clubface at impact, calculating the numbers from that moment. It needs almost no flight distance, which makes it the natural fit for shallow indoor rooms.

What it means for your room

	Photometric	Radar
Placement	Beside the ball	Behind the ball
Depth needed	Minimal	More (reads flight)
Best room	Tight / shallow indoors	Deeper rooms, outdoors
Ceiling mount?	No	No
Examples	Bushnell Launch Pro, Foresight	Garmin R10, Mevo+
Both	SkyTrak+ (photometric + radar)

Which should you pick?

Shallow room (under ~13 ft deep): favour photometric beside the ball for the most consistent indoor data.
Comfortable depth (16 ft+): either works; radar units like the R10/Mevo+ are great value.
Want one that does both: the SkyTrak+ combines the two and is the default home pick.

Accuracy isn't strictly "photometric vs radar" — top units of both types are excellent. Space and budget usually decide it for a home build.

Find your room's answer

Enter your depth and ceiling in the free room-fit calculator — if your room is shallow, it will steer you toward a floor/photometric setup.

FAQ

Is photometric or radar better for an indoor simulator?: Photometric is usually the easier indoor fit (sits beside the ball, minimal depth). Radar prefers more depth and excels in deeper rooms and outdoors.
Why does radar need more space?: It measures the ball in flight, so it needs distance behind and in front of the ball. Photometric reads impact from beside the ball.
Which units are which?: Radar: Garmin R10, Mevo+. Photometric: Bushnell Launch Pro, Foresight. SkyTrak+ does both.

Best launch monitors · SkyTrak+ review · R10 vs Mevo+ · Room size · Room-fit calculator

Photometric vs radar launch monitors

How each one works

What it means for your room

Which should you pick?

Find your room's answer

FAQ

Related